Resource 1
Tea Party Questions
- My definition of assessment is
- I think teachers assess because
- I am concerned about assessment because
- The most important objective of assessment to me is
- Some of the best examples of assessment I have seen in practice are
- Some types of assessment that would be particularly useful in a coastal
and marine studies context would be
Resource 2
Some Teacher's Views On Assessment
Questions
- Do any of these statements match your views?
- Which have relevance to coastal and marine studies? Why?
Teachers' Views
- It's to do with the tests and exams we set involving learning.
- It's finding out how good children are at developing understanding.
- It's something we use to keep a check on children in classes.
- Assessment is all about finding out if we are effective in our lessons.
- It's finding out children's strengths and weaknesses in learning.
- It's something that the educational psychologist does.
- It's something we use to sort out children.
- It's something done by the examinations authority and the education
department.
- Assessment is all about keeping records of children's marks and things
like that.
- It's to do with the government raising standards of environmental
understanding and awareness.
- Assessment is all about finding out where children need help.
Resource 3
Changing Views on Assessment
Source: Stimpson, P. (1995) The Assessment
of Learning within Environmental Education, Learning for a Sustainable
Environment: Innovations in Teacher Education Through Environmental
Education, UNESCO Asia-Pacific Centre of Educational Innovation
for Development, Bangkok, draft module. |
Let me not mince words. Almost all educators
feel that testing is a necessary part of education. I wholly disagree -
I do not think that testing is necessary, or useful, or even excusable.
At best, testing does more harm than good; at worst it hinders, distorts,
and corrupts the learning process. Testers say that testing techniques
are being continually improved and can eventually be perfected. Maybe
so - but no imaginable improvement in testing would overcome my objections
to it. Our chief concern should not be to improve testing, but to
find ways to eliminate it.
[W]e teachers say that we test children to find out what they have
learned, so that we can better know how to help them learn more.
This is about ninety-five percent untrue. There are two main reasons
why we test children: the first is to threaten them into doing what
we want done, and the second is to give us a basis for handing out
rewards and penalties on which the educational system - like
all coercive systems - must operate.
Holt (1969) pp. 51-52.
|
It is a central argument of this book that
assessment should play a critical part in any educational process.
Wherever learning takes place, or is intended that it should take
place, then it is reasonable for the learner, the teacher and other
interested parties to be curious about what has happened both in terms
of the learning process and in terms of any anticipated or un-anticipated
outcomes. We would argue that good education, by definition, encompasses
good assessment. However, we would wish to disassociate ourselves
immediately from much of what has gone under the guise of 'good' educational
assessment... Assessment has been viewed for far too long as a formal
process, which normally involves the administration of formal tests
and examinations through procedures that are totally divorced from
the educational process and setting to which they are supposed to
relate.
Murphy and Torrance (1988) p.7.
|
Resource 4
What is Assessment for?
Source: Stimpson, P. (1995) The Assessment of Learning within Environmental
Education, Learning for a Sustainable Environment: Innovations
in Teacher Education Through Environmental Education, UNESCO Asia-Pacific
Centre of Educational Innovation for Development, Bangkok, draft module. |
- To find out what students know about the coastal and marine studies,
what they understand, and what they can do.
- To find out what students do not know, do not understand and cannot
do.
- To provide a basis for feedback to learners to help them in their
coastal and marine studies.
- To motivate learners to learn about the environment and for the environment.
- To motivate environmental educators.
- To support teaching and learning in coastal and marine studies.
- To monitor and control standards on coastal and marine studies through
certification.
- To act as a measure for the accountability of coastal and marine studies
educators.
- To raise educational standards in environmental awareness, understanding
and action.
- To improve environmental curricula.
- To see whether learning objectives in coastal and marine studies are
being met.
- To rank order students by level of environmental learning.
- To diagnose environmental learning problems and needs.
- To diagnose teaching problems as a basis for evaluating the needs
of schools.
- To screen students who may not be environmentally aware or active.
- To select people for future careers or learning paths in coastal and
marine studies (eg. to stream children).
- To provide parents and others outside the school with information
about the environmental learning of children.
- To predict likely future environmental attitudes and actions of students
(and teachers and schools!).
Resource 5
Two Assessment Situations
Source: Stimpson, P. (1995) The Assessment of Learning within Environmental
Education, Learning for a Sustainable Environment: Innovations
in Teacher Education Through Environmental Education, UNESCO Asia-Pacific
Centre of Educational Innovation for Development, Bangkok, draft module. |
Sketch A
Yim-lin comes into her class of eleven year olds. She asks whether they
have all brought their lunch and with what they have wrapped their sandwiches.
Most of the children have used cling-film. "Why did they use it?" Yim-lin
asks. She continues, "What will they do with the cling-film when they
have finished eating?" The morning develops with a lesson on plastics,
how they are made, their impact on material and energy resources and the
problems they pose as waste. The children become interested in investigating
the way in which plastic waste enters the sea and the effects this has
on marine mammals. The children conclude the day by completing a set of
worksheet questions based on a library search.
Sketch B
At the end of Year 6, Yim-lin's 11 year-olds would be moving
to secondary school. There was a question of which school students would
go to and what particular problems students might carry with them. Yim-lin
gave the class a set of graded questions to test the children's level
of knowledge. She also asked the children to complete a self-reporting
questionnaire to assess pupil's attitudes and environmental/community
awareness; she used this information to generate a descriptive profile
for each child.
Questions
- List differences in the foci of assessment in the two sketches.
- Use the descriptive terms given in Resource 6 to analyse the
form of assessment which is taking place in each. What are the main
differences of purpose?
Resource 6
How to Assess
Source: Stimpson, P. (1995) The Assessment of Learning within Environmental
Education, Learning for a Sustainable Environment: Innovations
in Teacher Education Through Environmental Education, UNESCO Asia-Pacific
Centre of Educational Innovation for Development, Bangkok, draft module. |
There is often a tension in environmental education between summative
and formative, formal and informal, and terminal and continuous assessment
as they may emphasise different aspects of learning and seek to perform
different educational functions.
Formative assessment emphasises the on-going collection of information
about children's learning in coastal and marine studies which is used
to make decisions about how to enhance the learning capability of students.
Its main purpose is to assist learning. It is largely a matter between
the learner and the teacher and is described as 'low stakes' assessment.
It is often informal and usually non-judgemental. It is concerned with
what students can do and helping them with what they cannot do in relation
to expected criteria. Consequently, it is often either implicitly or explicitly
criterion-referenced in terms of environmental knowledge, enquiry skills
or values.
Summative assessment occurs at the end of a study and often reflects
the final product of learning. It is generally judgemental and is often
described as 'high stakes' assessment as it may be a critical determinant
of access to future learning paths or jobs. It is often concerned with
ranking people and is consequently norm-referenced in terms of relative
environmental understanding of students.
Informal assessment occurs as an inevitable, integral part of day-to-day
classroom activities, eg. teacher questioning, classroom observation,
home and class-work. It is often uncontrolled and seeks to be unobtrusive.
It is responsive to the needs of students. Spin-offs for learning are
generally at the forefront of the teacher's mind.
Formal assessment has no direct teaching function. Its sole function
is to provide knowledge about environmental education achievements for
someone else. It usually takes the form of tests and occurs at defined
times within conventional examination settings. It is contrived and there
are generally predetermined answers. The significance of data collected
is usually for summative purposes.
Terminal assessment occurs only once at the end of the coastal and
marine studies programme or at the end of a stage in the programme. It
is consequently periodic and final. It is often associated with formal
examinations in environmental education.
Continuous assessment is intermittent, regular and cumulative. It
is often, though not inevitably, associated with course-work assessment
in environmental education.
Resource 7
Possible Methods of Assessment in Coastal and Marine Studies
Source: Stimpson, P. (1995) The Assessment of Learning within Environmental
Education, Learning for a Sustainable Environment: Innovations
in Teacher Education Through Environmental Education, UNESCO Asia-Pacific
Centre of Educational Innovation for Development, Bangkok, draft module. |
Learning Objective |
Assessment Method |
Suitability
for Formative |
Suitability
for Summative |
Knowledge |
Completion items |
? |
Y |
Multiple choice (MC) |
? |
Y |
Short answer questions |
Y |
Y |
Data analysis and
interpretation |
Structured questions |
Y |
Y |
Laboratory practicals |
Y? |
|
Field work |
Y |
Y |
Reporting |
Oral presentation |
Y |
? |
Essay |
Y |
Y |
Report/Assignment |
Y |
? |
Individual/Group research project |
Y |
? |
Decision making |
Structured questions |
Y |
Y |
Decision-making exercises |
Y |
Y |
Projects |
Y |
? |
Role play |
Y |
? |
Attitudes and values
| Oral presentation |
Y |
? |
Classroom observation |
Y |
? |
Self-evaluation profile |
Y |
? |
Teacher produced profile |
Y |
Y |
Action |
Observation of student's actions |
Y |
? |
Self-evaluation profile |
Y |
? |
Y=Yes
?=uncertain/difficult |
Resource 8
Assessment Methods for Coastal and Marine Studies
- Merits and Pitfalls
Source: Stimpson, P. (1995) The Assessment of Learning within Environmental
Education, Learning for a Sustainable Environment: Innovations
in Teacher Education Through Environmental Education, UNESCO Asia-Pacific
Centre of Educational Innovation for Development, Bangkok, draft module. |
Method |
Examples |
Comment |
Knowledge |
Multiple choice (MC), completion, matching, true/false assertion
reasoning, short answer questions. |
Wide curriculum coverage possible; risk of over-emphasis on facts;
easy to mark but can be difficult to construct forms which assess
higher order learning; can trivialise learning. |
Essays |
Timed essays, resource based essay, extended writing, reports, open-book
examinations |
Easy to construct; difficult to mark reliably; good for higher order
thinking skills (e.g. evaluation) and argument; may overemphasise
writing; require criteria for useful feedback. |
Projects/Enquiries |
Based on field work or on secondary data. |
Assess ability to identify, describe, analyse and draw conclusions;
emphasises study and information processing skills; risk of copious
copying; time consuming to mark; need criteria for effective marking
and feedback. |
Structured questions |
Stimulus response, data based. Many of the advantages of projects
but more restricted, manageable and easier to mark; can trivialise
learning and generate routine responses. |
Many of the advantages of projects but more restricted, manageable
and easier to mark; can trivialise learning and generate routine responses. |
Oral assessment |
Presentations, debates, drama, discussion groups. |
Can encourage outgoing students to think creatively about the environment
but the shy may be overwhelmed; time consuming; perhaps the least
permanent and structured form of evidence; difficult to grade without
set criteria; useful in formative assessment. |
Classroom observation |
Teacher notes, checklists, comment banks, profiles, interviews. |
Rich source of evidence of enviro-sensitive behaviour; very time
consuming and therefore a problem with large classes; risk of data
overload; difficult to grade without set procedures and criteria. |
Self- assessment |
Student checklists, diaries, peer group assessment, negotiated self-reports,
can-do statements |
Can be (but not always) rewarding for students; difficult to set
up as an effective tool; needs practice and time to acclimatise to
method. |
Resource 9
Meeting the Objectives of Coastal and Marine Studies
|
Knowledge |
Awareness |
Skills/Problem Solving |
Attitudes |
Actions |
Objective tests |
|
|
|
|
|
Short answer |
|
|
|
|
|
Essay |
|
|
|
|
|
Decision making |
|
|
|
|
|
Checklists |
|
|
|
|
|
Structured Questions (Data responses) |
|
|
|
|
|
Oral |
|
|
|
|
|
Observation |
|
|
|
|
|
Self |
|
|
|
|
|
|